Journal Club: ERK1/2 and p38α/β Signaling in Tumor Cell Quiescence: Opportunities to Control Dormant Residual Disease

by Fatemeh Rahmatabadi

This article by Sosa et al. explores the biology of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), which are central to cancer relapses and metastasis. DTCs can spread early during tumor development—even from non-invasive lesions—and persist in distant organs such as the bone marrow, liver, and lungs. Many enter a dormant, non-proliferative state, evading therapies that target dividing cells. Clinical dormancy, defined as a prolonged asymptomatic period between treatment and relapse, may be driven by restricted angiogenesis, immune surveillance, or incomplete cellular transformation. Dormancy is actively maintained by metastasis suppressor genes (MSGs), including MKK4, MKK6, Nm23-H1, and BHLHB3, which regulate signaling pathways such as p38 and ERK.

The balance between p38 MAPK and ERK signaling is critical in determining DTC fate. High p38 and low ERK activity promote quiescence through activation of tumor suppressors like p53 and p21, suppression of cyclin D1, and engagement of stress-response programs, including the unfolded protein response (UPR). This signaling profile is shaped by the tumor microenvironment, particularly extracellular matrix (ECM) and integrin signaling. Disruption of integrin–FAK–EGFR pathways leads to p38 activation and deep G0–G1 arrest. Transcription factors downstream of p38, such as BHLHB3 and NR2F1, help sustain this dormant state, allowing DTCs to survive undetected for years.

Recognizing dormancy as an actively maintained state suggests novel therapeutic strategies—not only targeting proliferation but also sustaining dormancy or selectively eliminating dormant DTCs before they reactivate. This study highlights the critical role of the microenvironment and p38/ERK signaling in regulating dormancy and suggests that targeting these pathways may help prevent metastatic relapse.

Figure 1. More general schemes regarding the mechanisms of tumor cell dormancy can be found in ref. 5. Here we focus on data limited to the role of the ERK1/2 and p38α/β pathways. Left, signaling pathways discovered in a model of aggressive tumor cell (HEp3) reprogramming into quiescence. In vitro expansion of primary HEp3 tumor cells (proliferative tumor cells) leads to their reprogramming into a dormancy program (dormant tumor cells). A key-signaling feature of these dormant tumor cells is low ERK1/2 and high p38α activation. The resulting ERKlow/p38high ratio induces G0-G1 arrest controlled by the upregulation of p53 (R213Q), NR2F1, and BHLHB3, and the downregulation of FOXM1 and c-Jun, TFs that promote G1 exit. These signals are required for dormant HEp3 cells to enter and maintain the quiescent state. Furthermore, p38α-dependent activation of ATF6α leads to mTOR activation and subsequent basal survival of dormant HEp3 cells entering quiescence in vivo (basal survival). The ERKlow/p38high ratio also induces expression of the chaperone BiP/Grp78, which inhibits Bax activation to prevent apoptosis. However, this survival mechanism appears to be operational only in response to added stress such as chemotherapy (adaptive survival). Integration of these 3 processes (G0-G1 arrest + basal survival + adaptive survival) defines the underlying mechanisms for the acquisition of a dormant phenotype. These hallmarks may be regulated by different mechanisms, depending on the context and the presence of, e.g., MSGs. In contrast, in primary proliferating tumors or tumors exiting dormancy, the ratio is reversed and the resulting ERKlow/p38high ratio switches cell signaling to promote a proliferation phenotype. Right, potential scenarios in which dormancy (G0-G1 arrest + basal survival + adaptive survival) or proliferative programs might be activated. In primary expanding tumors, a proliferative scenario prevails, and tumor cells are able to disseminate carrying this cell-signaling profile. In one scenario, when these cells reach a growth-permissive target tissue microenvironment (e.g., lung), a proliferative phenotype prevails and dormancy is prevented. In contrast, in growth-restrictive sites, such as the BM, a dormant phenotype prevails (G0-G1 arrest + basal survival + adaptive survival). The latter scenario presupposes that DTCs are responsive to cues from the tissue microenvironment that can modulate dormancy. It is possible that perturbations of the tissue microenvironment (i.e., irradiation) or the presence of specific stromal cells such as macrophages (not depicted) that lead to tissue remodeling and cross-talk with tumor cells could interrupt dormancy, leading to metastasis.

Continue your reading  here:

Sosa MS, Avivar-Valderas A, Bragado P, Wen HC, Aguirre-Ghiso JA. ERK1/2 and p38α/β signaling in tumor cell quiescence: opportunities to control dormant residual disease.Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 15;17(18):5850-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2574.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *